Anchor Points

 

National Anchor Points

The ELRC National Anchor Points are individuals who support the data collection process in each of the 30 participating countries. Together they form the Language Resources Board, the governance body of the European Language Resource Coordination effort.

Each country is represented by one technological representative (Technology National Anchor Point) and one representative from the public services administration (Public Services National Anchor Point).

The Technology NAP is a highly regarded language or language technology expert. He or she often has a distinguished academic or research background, or represents a national language institution. The Technology NAPs for all CEF countries and are listed below.

The Public Services NAP is a representative of national public services, public administration or a ministry. He or she acts as a liaison contact person to the national, regional and local administrations, and is able to effectively mobilize and spread the word about the importance of language resources and the ELRC effort among the public authorities/ministries in each country. 

Frequently asked questions from NAPs about organising ELRC workshops

 
Finland
sort descending
Kaisamari Kuhmonen Public Services NAP
Krister Lindén Technology NAP
Estonia
sort descending
Andero Adamson Public Services NAP
Kadri Vare Technology NAP
Germany
sort descending
Alexandra Soska Public Services NAP
Andreas Witt Technology NAP
Portugal
sort descending
Paulo Vale Public Services NAP
António Branco Technology NAP
Italy
sort descending
Claudia Foti Public Services NAP
Simonetta Montemagni Technology NAP
Latvia
sort descending
Armands Magone Public Services NAP
Normunds Gruzitis Technology NAP
Slovenia
sort descending
Marčela Novljan Lovrinčić Public Services NAP
Simon Krek Technology NAP
Belgium
sort descending
Stijn De Smeytere Public Services NAP
Veronique Hoste Technology NAP
Norway
sort descending
Kristine Eide Public Services NAP
Jon Arild Olsen Technology NAP
Lithuania
sort descending
Andrius Utka Public Services NAP
Virginijus Dadurkevičius Technology NAP
Spain
sort descending
David Pérez-Fernández Public Services NAP
Núria Bel Technology NAP
Denmark
sort descending
Sabine Kirchmeier-Andersen Public Services NAP
Peter Gylden Houmann Public Services NAP
Bolette Sandford Pedersen Technology NAP
Hungary
sort descending
Zoltán Bódi Public Services NAP
Tamás Várárdi Technology NAP
Romania
sort descending
Laura Mihailescu Public Services NAP
Dan Tufis Technology NAP
Greece
sort descending
Nancy Routzouni Public Services NAP
Maria Gavriilidou Technology NAP
Slovakia
sort descending
Diana Rigová Public Services NAP
Miroslav Zumrík Technology NAP
Austria
sort descending
Jürgen Kotzian Public Services NAP
Gerhard Budin Technology NAP
Sweden
sort descending
Rickard Domeij Public Services NAP
Arne Jönsson Technology NAP
Bulgaria
sort descending
Hristina Dobreva Public Services NAP
Svetla Koeva Technology NAP
Poland
sort descending
Anna Kotarska Public Services NAP
Maciej Ogrodniczuk Technology NAP
Luxembourg
sort descending
Gérard Soisson Public Services NAP
Dimitra Anastasiou Technology NAP
France
sort descending
Thibault Grouas Public Services NAP
François Yvon Technology NAP
Malta
sort descending
Donatienne Spiteri Public Services NAP
Michael Rosner Technology NAP
Ireland
sort descending
Micheál Ó Conaire Public Services NAP
Teresa Lynn Technology NAP
Iceland
sort descending
Auður Hauksdóttir Public Services NAP
Eirikur Rögnvaldsson Technology NAP
Cyprus
sort descending
Natassa Avraamides-Haratsi Public Services NAP
Fryni Kakoyianni-Doa Technology NAP
Netherlands
sort descending
Jan Odijk Technology NAP
Czech Republic
sort descending
Jan Hajic Technology NAP
Croatia
sort descending
Marko Tadic Technology NAP
U.K.
sort descending
Sophia Ananiadou Technology NAP
 
* nominated by CEF Expert Group